Mitos Peziarahan Pantai Selatan Melalui Perspektif Pseudo-Etnofotografi

Authors

  • Aji Susanto Anom Purnomo Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31598/bahasarupa.v7i3.1530

Keywords:

pseudo-ethnophotography, south coast, parangkusumo, kejawen, myth

Abstract

The creative process of creating fine-art photographic works so far is considered to have an emphasis on personal artistic expression. This research seeks to present an alternative offer where personal expression and socio-cultural phenomena can be cohesively intertwined and built in the creative process of creating fine-art photographic works. This is answered through the concept of pseudo-ethnophotography. Ethno-photography is an approach in social research that is the trajectory of photographic record and ethnographic narratives. The ethno-photographic method is used to understand society's point of view that gives meaning to a specific cultural phenomenon. Recent developments in the ethnographic approach gave rise to the concept of pseudo-ethnography. The idea arises from a new symptom of artwork creation where an artist descends into a community environment, conducts a brief interview, and then creates artwork from the data obtained. This research then adapts the pseudo-ethnographic approach with an ethno-photography approach to pseudo-ethnophotography. The South Sea entity (Laut Kidul) has a solid and deep-rooted myth for the Javanese. The figure that emerged from the myth is Gusti Kanjeng Ratu Kidul, the ruler of the The South Sea Palace. Parangkusumo Beach is one of the beaches located in the South Sea; Parangkusumo Beach is located in Bantul Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta. Parangkusumo Beach has a role as a cultural entity that becomes the space of local myths. This myth strengthens the roots of Javanese identity, often known as Kejawen. This research sets out by applying the concept of pseudo-ethnography and adapting it to the pattern of creating photographic art into pseudo-ethnophotography. The stages of research used are literature study, observation, photographic recording, and data analysis. This study aims to offer a point of view that departs from the emic view of the myth of Parangkusumo Beach and its influence on the philosophy of the jawan of pilgrims. This research results in a series of photo works, which are pseudo-ethnophotographic recordings and textual narratives processed from data analysis and personal stories from pilgrims. This research is expected to present an understanding of the Javanese philosophy of the pilgrims who are part of their Javanese identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. S. A. Purnomo, Pengantar Etnofotografi. Yogyakarta: Balai Penerbit ISI Yogyakarta, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://isbn.perpusnas.go.id/Account/SearchBuku?searchTxt=978-623-5884-07-3&searchCat=ISBN

E. Edwards, Out and About: Photography, Topography, and Historical Imagination, 1st ed. Oxfordshire: Imprint Routledge, 2014.

D. M. Hayano, “Auto-Ethnography: Paradigms, Problems, and Prospects,” Hum. Organ. 38, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 1979, doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.38.1.u761n5601t4g318v.

J. M. Jaja, “Myths in African concept of reality,” Int. J. Educ. Adm. Policy Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9–14, 2014, doi: 10.5897/ijeaps11.060.

M. Angeline, “Mitos dan Budaya,” Humaniora, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 190, 2015, doi: 10.21512/humaniora.v6i2.3325.

D. B. Yuwono, “SPIRITUALITAS MASYARAKAT JAWA KONTEMPORER: Eksistensi dan Makna Ritual di Parangkusumo,” Panangkaran J. Penelit. Agama dan Masy., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–57, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.14421/panangkaran.v7i1.3142.

Simuh, Sufisme Jawa, Transformasi Tasawuf Islam ke Mistik Jawa. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2019.

H. Foster, The Return of the Real. Massachussets: The MIT Press, 1996.

S. Hadi, Seni Dalam Ritual Agama. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Buku Pustaka, 2006.

S. Soedjono, Pot-Pourri Fotografi. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Trisakti, 2006.

A. Datoem, “Foto-Etnografi dalam Proses Penciptaan Karya Seni Fotografi,” J. Seni Budaya Panggung, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 109–209, 2013, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v23i2.94.

C. Moutakas, Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, Lon- don, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Inc., 1994.

W. Windiani and F. Nurul R, “MENGGUNAKAN METODE ETNOGRAFI DALAM PENELITIAN SOSIAL,” Dimens. J. Sosiol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 87–92, 2016, doi: 10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1956.

K. E. Y. Low and N. Abdullah, “Sensory experience as method,” Oxford Handb. Sociol. Body Embodiment, no. December, pp. 53–68, 2019, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190842475.013.4.

D. Schwartz, “Visual ethnography: Using Photography in Qualitative Research,” Qual. Sociol., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 119–154, 1989, doi: 10.1007/BF00988995.

N. Volaric, J. Pibernik, and J. Dolic, “The Popularity of Black and White Photography in the World of Digital Photography,” in INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE - DESIGN 2010, 2010, pp. 1903–1910. [Online]. Available: https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/476052.1903_N._Volaric.pdf

M. Sutedja and F. Athoriq, “Fotografi Monokromatik Hitam Putih Dalam Dunia Fotografi Modern,” Widyakala J. Pembang. Jaya Univ., vol. 8, p. 46, 2021, doi: 10.36262/widyakala.v8i0.390.

S. Ackerman, “Exploring Freud’s Resistance to The Oceanic Feeling,” J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 9–31, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0003065117690352.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31